|
 |
 |

RESEARCH
Business
Economy
WALL
STREET
To beat earnings expectations, first you have to lower
them
Mark
Reutter, Business Editor
(217) 333-0568; mreutter@uiuc.edu
2/1/02
CHAMPAIGN, Ill. You
needn't cook the books to make yourself look good on Wall Street. A
safer approach is to talk down your company's fortunes to analysts before
springing a "better-than-expected" earnings announcement for
the quarter.
"Beating the forecast" does wonders for a company's stock
price. A University of Illinois economist who analyzed thousands of
forecasts of publicly owned companies between 1989 and 1998 found that
there was a significantly higher probability for a company to beat the
consensus forecast if the forecast was lowered two weeks prior to the
announcement.
"We document empirically that many firms apparently have ways of
lowering the forecasts as the earnings announcement date approaches,"
said Dan Bernhardt, the UI economist who conducted the study with Murillo
Campello, an economist at Michigan State University.
"Companies have enormous incentives to manage earnings so as to
generate quarterly results that exceed the consensus forecast,"
Bernhardt said in an interview. A company's stock price tends to rise
following a "positive earnings surprise" and typically tumbles
following a report that is below what analysts had predicted.
The economists found that the chance of a positive earnings surprise
increased when late forecasts lowered the consensus forecast. This finding
is "the opposite of what would be predicted if deviations of late
forecasts from the consensus were due to the arrival of new or better
information," Bernhardt said.
Examining the evidence empirically, "we found overwhelming evidence
that investors are 'fooled' by late arriving forecasts that change the
consensus. We cannot make such inferences about analysts who have complex
relationships to maintain with the companies they cover."
Bernhardt theorized that less experienced analysts were more likely
to make late forecasts and were more likely to revise their forecasts
than analysts who had covered a company for a longer period. Also there
is sometimes a legitimate reason for management to lower expectations,
or create "slack." Especially in fast-growing companies, earnings
may change dramatically in the weeks or even days before a quarter ends.
"A firm that expects earnings to fall far short of the consensus
may give up on beating the consensus and take a one-time earnings bath,"
the UI economist said. "Conversely, a firm that expects earnings
to greatly exceed the consensus may want to shift some earnings forward,
saving financial slack for future quarters where beating the consensus
may be more difficult."
Remember that corporate earnings announcements are not audited and are
not reviewed by regulators. Essentially public relations documents,
they often exclude basic costs such as marketing and interest that are
required in audited filings to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Bernhardt-Campello working paper is titled "The Dynamics of
Forecast Management."
|
 |
 |
|