|
 |
 |

RESEARCH
Business
Government
THE
DISABLED
Government not keeping up with changes in disability
care
Mark
Reutter, Business Editor
(217) 333-0568; mreutter@uiuc.edu
3/1/03
CHAMPAIGN, Ill. — Half a million mentally retarded and developmentally
disabled Americans live with their elderly parents. That number is expected
to double during the next 25 years, posing a potential crisis for the
care of disabled adult children.
Although there are many government programs focused on the elderly and
the disabled, "they rarely share resources and often compete with
each other for public resources," Luana Olivas wrote in the current
issue of the Elder Law Journal.
As a result, "aging parents seeking services for themselves and
their disabled child have to navigate, often unsuccessfully, between
two massive systems to meet their family’s needs."
Deinstitutionalization of the disabled began in the 1970s with a series
of judicial and legislative changes. By the early 1980s, states began
closing residential institutions in significant numbers. "Whereas
families used to be pressured to ‘put their children away’
from birth, they are now expected to be substantially involved in their
care, if not directly responsible for it," Olivas wrote.
Government programs have not kept up with these major changes in disability
care. Currently, disability services are generally centered on rehabilitation,
vocational training or special education. Funding for these services
are made available to the states through various federal programs. Many
are need-based and benefit the aged, blind or disabled.
To finance long-term care for the disabled, states receive Medicaid
reimbursements from Washington and use them to underwrite institutions
qualifying as Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded.
Medicaid funds also finance community services and support groups through
the Home and Community-Based Services waiver program. These waivers
provide funds intended to help an elderly or disabled person live at
home or in a community setting rather than in an institution.
According to Olivas, an editor at the journal, the problem with these
programs is the lack of coordination – and direction. The money
saved from closing state institutions for the retarded and disabled
was not redirected to funding long-term care. Moreover, there has been
almost no research on how to design family-based programs involving
aging parents with disabled children, and, so far, little provision
for the care of the disabled whose parents die or become incapacitated
except on an ad hoc crisis basis.
"What little is known about the needs of aging caregiving parents
is that their most pressing concerns including the availability of alternative
housing, home-care assistance, financial planning for their child and
guardianship options. These concerns change over time, affecting the
type of help they need."
Comprehensive research is necessary to assess potential solutions to
these and other problems, the author concluded. The Elder Law Journal
is published by the University of Illinois College
of Law.
|
 |
 |
|