|
 |
 |

NEWS
INDEX
Archives
2004
May
If you want to help
your children with homework, take it easy, studies suggest
Jim Barlow, Life Sciences Editor
217-333-5802; jebarlow@uiuc.edu
5/11/04
CHAMPAIGN, Ill. —
What can parents do to help children doing poorly in school? Two new
studies at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign suggest that
supporting their children’s autonomy and refraining from being
controlling will help kids do better on their homework and raise their
grades.
The findings, published in the May/June issue of the journal Child Development,
send home a poignant message. If parents intervene in a controlling
way by issuing commands, by doing the assigned tasks for their kids
or by rushing them, struggling children become disengaged. Such children
may do even more poorly at school over time, said Eva Pomerantz, a professor
of psychology at Illinois.
“When mothers respond to their children in a manner that supports
autonomy, children doing poorly actually experience increases in their
performance during their interactions with their mothers and the next
day,” she said. “Perhaps most importantly their school grades
improve over time.”
The first study involved 110 mothers and their elementary schoolchildren
who took part in the research at a campus laboratory. The mothers’
use of control and autonomy support as they assisted children with a
simulated homework task was examined. When mothers assisted in a controlling
manner, children who initially did poorly at the tasks became disengaged,
showing a lack of concentration. In contrast, when mothers were autonomy-supportive,
the performance of the struggling children improved.
An autonomy-support approach allows children to explore their environment
independently. Parents may discuss a situation, but the children must
decide for themselves what is important and generate their own problem-solving
strategies. Such experiences may be especially likely to benefit children
who are struggling, Pomerantz said.
In the second study, investigators examined the mothers’ use of
control and autonomy support in the context of responding to their children’s
real life failures. In this study, 121 mothers reported every night
for two weeks on whether their children did poorly that day –
such as struggling with a school assignment, fighting at school, or
not doing chores at home. The mothers indicated how they responded.
When mothers used controlling responses, such as punishing children
or saying they were disappointed in them, children doing poorly in school
performed poorly again the next day, and their grades decreased six
months later. When mothers used the autonomy-supportive response of
discussing failures with the children, the ones doing poorly in school
improved the next day and their grades increased six months later.
“These two studies suggest that if parents want to help their
low-achieving children improve their school performance, being autonomy-supportive
rather than controlling is vital,” Pomerantz said. “This
may be of particular importance when interacting with low-achieving
children, because they receive feedback in school that they lack competence.”
As a consequence, she said, children may look to their parents to aid
them in feeling competent. “When parents are controlling, they
may inhibit children from developing important abilities and convey
to children that they lack competence. In contrast, when parents are
autonomy-supportive, they may aid children in building their competencies
while also letting them know that they are capable of independent work.”
In both studies, investigators found that children doing well were not
affected in terms of their performance by their mothers’ responses,
regardless of the approach. However, Pomerantz emphasized that parents
of high-achieving children should not avoid being involved in their
children’s lives. Current work in her laboratory suggests that
when mothers are present to assist high-achieving children, their emotional
functioning is boosted.
The co-authors of the study were Florrie Fei-Yin Ng and Gwen A. Kenney-Benson,
doctoral students working with Pomerantz when the research was conducted.
The National Science Foundation and National Institute of Mental Health
funded the research.
|
 |
 |
|