|
 |
 |

NEWS
INDEX
Archives
2005
April
Biosphere is source, not sink,
for carbon dioxide emissions, study shows
James E.
Kloeppel, Physical Sciences Editor
217-244-1073; kloeppel@uiuc.edu
 |
Click
photo to enlarge |
| Photo
by Kwame Ross |
| Atul
Jain, a professor of atmospheric sciences at the University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and graduate student
Xiaojuan Yang report that the biosphere might now
be acting as a source, not as a sink. Rather than
storing carbon dioxide, the biosphere may have recently
begun driving atmospheric levels higher. |
|
|
4/25/05
CHAMPAIGN, Ill. —
Converting forests into croplands and pastures reduces carbon storage,
say scientists who studied the impacts of human-induced change on terrestrial
ecosystems. The study results have important implications for predicting
carbon dioxide levels, and will help provide a more complete understanding
of Earth’s carbon cycle.
In its most recent report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
found that Earth’s biosphere was acting as a sink for carbon dioxide.
By storing carbon dioxide, plant growth – especially that of trees
– could help reduce the effects of global warming, and could be
part of meeting the targets and timetables of the Kyoto Protocol.
Using a more advanced version of the Integrated Assessment Model, Atul
Jain, a professor of atmospheric
sciences at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and
graduate student Xiaojuan Yang report that the biosphere might now be
acting as a source, not as a sink. Rather than storing carbon dioxide,
the biosphere may have recently begun driving atmospheric levels higher.
“We studied different land cover changes for cropland data sets
in combination with pasturelands,” Jain said. “Our model-estimated
results for net uptake of carbon dioxide by the biosphere suggest that
greater account for pastureland processes may result in significantly
lesser estimated uptake of carbon dioxide.”
Furthermore, continued clearing of forests at the same pace will accelerate
the rate of increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, Jain said.
Carbon dioxide absorbed by trees can be released quickly through slash
and burn practices, or slowly through conversion into products such
as lumber and paper or through the gradual decay of woody material.
Regardless of rate, the carbon locked in trees will ultimately be returned
to the atmosphere when trees are removed.
Human activities have significantly altered the vegetation cover in
nearly every part of the globe. While the rate of change has stabilized
in developed countries, deforestation abounds in many developing countries.
Particularly hard hit are the regions of South and Southeast Asia, tropical
Africa and Latin America.
“Land-use changes can alter regional and global climate through
changes in the biophysical characteristics of Earth’s surface
and changes in the global carbon cycle,” Jain said. “Whether
the biosphere is a source or sink in a given geographic area depends
on such factors as temperature, precipitation, soil properties and types
of vegetation cover.”
Using the Integrated Science Assessment Model developed at Illinois
and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization data, Jain
and Yang examined the effects of human-induced land use emissions on
terrestrial carbon storage between the years 1765 and 1990. They found
that not only do changes in land use significantly alter carbon storage,
but also enhance decomposition in soils as a result of global warming,
particularly at high latitudes. Consequently, the terrestrial biosphere
is losing its capacity to store carbon, resulting in concentrations
of atmospheric carbon rising at an increasing rate.
“The Kyoto Protocol allows a country to apply the carbon stored
in its forests and other ecosystems toward its budgeted reduction in
carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases,” Jain said. “By
providing a geographically explicit distribution of net sources and
sinks, this study will help us more accurately determine how much carbon
is being stored or released in different regions.”
Jain and Yang report their findings in a paper accepted for publication
in the journal Global Biogeochemical Cycles and posted on the journal’s
Web site. The U.S. Department of Energy funded the study.
|
 |
 |
|