|
 |
 |

NEWS
INDEX
Archives
2005
November
Give a visiting ant a nice
place to stay and it might stick around
Jim Barlow,
Life Sciences Editor
217-333-5802; jebarlow@uiuc.edu
11/15/05
 |
Click
photo to enlarge |
| Photo
by L. Brian Stauffer |
| Entomologist
Andy Suarez holds a Tropical Hunting ant (dinoponera
australis), native to northern Argentina/southern
Brazil. This ant is representative of species transported
to the United States, but have not established themselves
here, unlike some other species. |
|
|
CHAMPAIGN, Ill.
— Many insects enter the United States accidentally, as hitchhikers
on various plants imported in commerce, but how many really stay?
Conventional thinking says the answer is in the numbers of both insects
and times they enter, but new findings to be published in the Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences suggest that opportunity alone is
no guarantee of a successful invasion.
Of 232 species of ants that entered U.S. ports uninvited from 1927 to
1985, 28 species (12 percent) now occur as established non-native species,
scientists from three universities report. Their paper appears this
week online in the PNAS Early Edition. An important factor in the ants’
success, they say, was nesting preferences.
 |
Click
photo to enlarge |
| Photo
courtesy Alex Wild (myrmecos.net) |
| A
ground-nesting Argentine ant (Linepithema humile)
feeds on the honeydew of a Brown Soft Scale (Coccus
hesperidum), a pest of citrus, that is on a tangerine
tree. The ant is an additional pest to citrus by spreading
the scale and defending the scale from biological
controls such as parasitic flies and wasps. This ant
species arrived in Louisiana in 1891 and California
in 1907. |
|
|
“There are
a huge number of species being moved around that don’t become
established, so opportunity alone isn’t sufficient,” said
Andrew V. Suarez, a professor in the entomology
and animal biology
departments at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. “This
makes sense, because many of these species have specific biological
characteristics that prevent them from becoming established in a new
environment.”
Ants that stuck
around were either ground-nesting species or arboreal species that did
not depend solely on specific types of trees common to their native
lands, Suarez said. “This kind of information is important, because
it’s going to help us identify the characteristics that may promote
the success of non-native organisms. Eventually, we can use this information
to keep the new wave of invaders from becoming established.”
 |
Click
photo to enlarge |
| Photo
courtesy Alex Wild (myrmecos.net) |
| An
opened dead twig reveals a nest with several Guatemalan
Pseudomyrmex pallida, arboreal ants common from southeastern
United States to Costa Rica, where it typically nests
in dead stems of herbaceous plants. Visible at right
is a large queen ant whose abdomen is distended with
eggs. These ants also have made homes in the U.S. |
|
|
Suarez primarily
studies Argentine ants, an aggressive species that has caused problems
in Southern California since arriving in 1905 and successfully establishing
large colonies that overwhelm native food webs.
His work led him to the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum
of Natural History, where he found a gold mine of untapped ant history.
In numerous containers were mostly unidentified ants that the U.S. Department
of Agriculture had captured at quarantine sites around the country.
Each container was labeled with a port of departure and a port of entry.
The ants had been collected from plants or plant material, mostly tropical
in origin, before any of the ants had a chance to establish themselves.
Suarez, then a postdoctoral student, and colleague Phillip S. Ward,
a professor at the University of California at Davis, spent years identifying
232 different species from 58 genera and 12 subfamilies from the 394
records stored at the museum. Suarez and Ward then teamed with David
A. Holway, a professor of biology at the University of California at
San Diego, to analyze their discoveries.
 |
Click
photo to enlarge |
| Photo
courtesy of Brian Fisher, California Academy of
Sciences |
| Species
shown in the top three rows are among those identified
in the USDA samples that have successfully established
themselves in the United States. The five species
in the bottom row were in the samples, but have not
yet been successful in the U.S. |
|
|
Of the 232 species
identified, the researchers were able to determine definitive data on
nest-site preferences of 156 species. Using multiple-logistic regression,
the scientists tested the influence of how many times in the records
particular species were imported, nesting behavior and their interaction
on the success or failure of successful establishment.
Slightly more than half of 156 species they identified were tree-nesting
ants, and, only 14 percent of these arboreal ants (four species) became
established in the U.S., probably because they weren’t dependent
on specific kinds of trees, Suarez said.
“As a group of introduced species, invasive ants are clearly important,”
Holway said. “Five species of ants, for example, are included
in the top 100 worst invasive organisms by the IUCN (The World Conservation
Union).”
This National Science Foundation-funded study provides a rare look at
data on “failed introductions for an important group of unintentionally
introduced insects,” he said. “To date, few studies on introduced
insects, other than those intentionally introduced for biological control,
have addressed the issue of failed introductions.”
The three researchers also noted the vital role that museums play in
advancing scientific inquiry, and they urged a new quarantine program
to curate intercepted material.
|
 |
 |
|