|
 |
 |

SCIENCE
INDEX
2000
2001
2002
Chemistry
Scientists achieve
protein folding comparison breakthrough
Jim
Kloeppel, Physical Sciences Editor
(217) 244-1073; kloeppel@uiuc.edu
10/21/02
CHAMPAIGN,
Ill. For years, the comparison of simulated and experimental
protein folding kinetics has been a "Holy Grail" for biologists
and chemists. But scientists seeking to confirm protein-folding theory
with laboratory experiments have been unable to cross the microsecond
barrier. This obstacle in time existed because experiments could not
be performed fast enough, nor simulations run long enough, to permit
a direct comparison.
Now,
measurements from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and
molecular dynamics simulations from Stanford University have at last
been compared and found to be in very good agreement. A paper describing
the work has been accepted for publication in the journal Nature, and
was posted on its Web site www.nature.com/nature.
"By crossing the microsecond barrier, we can directly compare simulated
and experimental protein folding dynamics, such as folding rates and
equilibrium constants," said Martin Gruebele, an Illinois professor
of chemistry, physics and biophysics.
To allow experiment and theory to meet on a microsecond time scale,
the researchers designed a small protein based on the work of Barbara
Imperiali and her colleagues, now at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology. Consisting of only 23 amino acids, the protein contains
all three basic elements of secondary structure – helices, beta
sheets and loops – but can fold simply and rapidly.
At Illinois, Gruebele and graduate student Houbi Nguyen measured folding
times using a fast temperature jump experimental procedure. To initiate
the folding and unfolding dynamics, the solution was heated rapidly
by a single pulse from an infrared laser. As the proteins began twisting
into their characteristic shapes, a series of pulses from an ultraviolet
laser caused some of the amino acids to fluoresce, revealing to the
researchers a time-sequence of folding and unfolding events from which
the folding rate constant was obtained.
At Stanford, physical chemist Vijay Pande and graduate student Christopher
Snow accumulated more than 700 microseconds of molecular dynamics simulations
by dividing the work among more than 30,000 volunteer computers distributed
around the world.
Inspired by previous distributed computing initiatives, such as SETI@Home
an immensely popular program that searches radio telescope data
for evidence of extraterrestrial transmissions Pande developed
a similar screen saver, which he called Folding@Home. The program broke
the number crunching into many thousands of tiny pieces, each covering
only 5-20 nanoseconds of folding time, and ran them using spare time
on the volunteer computers.
"The computational predictions were in extremely good agreement
with our experimentally determined folding times and equilibrium constants,"
Gruebele said. "For example, our group came up with an average
folding time of 7.5 microseconds, while Pande’s group came up
with 8.0 microseconds."
Moreover, while distributed computing initiatives like SETI@Home have
offered the promise of novel scientific advances, Folding@Home's success
is both an important advance in understanding protein folding and it
is the first time a distributed computing project has yielded a significant
advance.
The simulations also demonstrated the heterogeneous nature of the folding
event and the funnel-shaped appearance of the protein's energy landscape.
"The protein can fall downhill to its native state through many
different scenarios," Pande said. "In some of the simulations,
the beta sheet formed first, in others the alpha helix formed first,
and in still others the loop formed first. Because the protein can follow
more than one pathway, a variety of folding times will result."
By comparing absolute quantities through experiment and simulation,
the researchers can determine energy barriers and relative energies
more accurately than before. The next step, they say, is to perform
a similar comparison using a larger, more complex protein.
The National Institutes of Health, American Chemical Society and National
Science Foundation funded the work.
|
 |
 |
|