|
 |
 |

SCIENCE
INDEX
2000
2001
2002
Atmospheric Sciences
Alternative energy
sources needed to mitigate global warming, scientists say
Jim
Kloeppel, Physical Sciences Editor
(217) 244-1073; kloeppel@uiuc.edu
10/31/02
CHAMPAIGN, Ill. — Regulations
alone will not stabilize atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and curb
global warming, an international team of climate and technology experts
says. What’s needed is the further development of alternative
energy technologies that permit worldwide economic development while
simultaneously stabilizing carbon dioxide levels and controlling climate
change.
In an article
published in the Nov. 1 issue of the journal Science, scientists at
the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and their collaborators
evaluate known advanced energy technologies for their capability to
supply carbon-emission-free energy and their potential for large-scale
commercialization. There are no simple solutions, they say.
During the last century, the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide
has increased from about 275 parts per million to about 370 parts per
million. Unchecked, it will surpass 550 parts per million by the end
of this century, the article states. Climate models and paleoclimate
data indicate that 550 parts per million of carbon dioxide, if sustained,
could eventually produce global warming comparable in magnitude to the
global cooling of the last Ice Age.
Primary power consumption today is about 12 terawatts, of which 85 percent
is fossil-fueled.
"As world population increases and we strive for a higher standard
of living – particularly in the developing nations – more
energy will be consumed, with an attendant rise in carbon dioxide emissions,"
said Michael Schlesinger, a professor of atmospheric
sciences at Illinois and a co-author of the paper. "We must
limit the levels of emissions at some point, and that means we will
have to replace fossil fuels with alternative sources that eliminate
or significantly reduce the amount of carbon emissions."
The most effective way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions while continuing
to support economic growth and equity is to develop revolutionary technologies
for energy production, distribution, storage and conversion, the article
states.
Although some alternative energy sources exist – wind power, solar
and nuclear fission, for example – they are more expensive than
fossil fuels and therefore less likely to be implemented on a grand
scale. "An effective energy policy would not focus on just one
of the many possible alternatives," Schlesinger said. "There
is no clear winner at this time that could fully replace fossil fuels."
Another possible approach is sequestration – where carbon dioxide
emitted from fossil fuels would be collected and stored in trees, oceans
and other potential reservoirs.
"While carbon capture and sequestration could eliminate the carbon
dioxide emissions from fossil fuels, the technology is still in its
infancy, and much work remains to make it viable," said Atul Jain,
a professor of atmospheric sciences at Illinois and a co-author of the
paper.
The message presented in the article is clear, Jain said. "To reduce
carbon dioxide emissions and stabilize the climate, we must switch to
alternative energy sources. We need to invest in new technologies and
make them cost effective."
The article concludes: "Combating global warming by radical restructuring
of the global energy system could be the technology challenge of the
century. … Although regulation can play a role, the fossil fuel
greenhouse effect is an energy problem that cannot be simply regulated
away."
Researchers collaborating on the project are from Columbia University,
Exxon Mobil Research and Engineering Co., Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, McGill University
in Canada, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National
Center for Atmospheric Research, the Naval Research Laboratory, New
York University, University of Arizona, University of California at
Irvine and University of Houston. Martin Hoffert of New York University
was the lead author of the article. The U.S. Department of Energy funded
the project.
|
 |
 |
|